9 May 2006
袁靄儀 v. 協峰電子有限公司及另一人
- Citation
- 袁靄儀 v. 協峰電子有限公司及另一人
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV114/2006
Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal against refusal of RAO leave dismissed because the disputed documents were disclosed via the EOC and are subject to immunity/confidentiality/implied undertaking as previously decided by Tang J, the plaintiff offered no credible contemporaneous evidence to the contrary, and the attempts to add defendants and re‑plead were a misuse of the court process to obtain collateral advantage and harassment rather than any arguable cause of action.