17 May 2002
HKSAR v. GOLD RAM ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Citation
- HKSAR v. GOLD RAM ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA912/2001
The information was valid because s.6(1) creates the offence and particulars may instance multiple failures under s.6(2) without duplicity; on the facts the Magistrate was entitled to find the appellant had not implemented a proper risk assessment or safe system of work, that the drilling‑rig was not designed to act as a hoist and that the appellant failed to discharge the onus under s.38, so the conviction was upheld.