25 Feb 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 朱以中
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1223
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA231/2024
The High Court held the magistrate did not err: there was no review application before the magistrate and the statutory review period had likely expired; the magistrate was entitled to proceed with the seizure application, to stay the seizure and to substitute an instalment payment order; the magistrate reasonably rejected the appellant's sale/transfer defence and the appellant did not subsequently pursue a review, therefore the appeal is dismissed and the magistrate's order is affirmed.