13 Feb 1991
KEY UP LTD v. SO FOOK LUNG AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- KEY UP LTD v. SO FOOK LUNG AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA966/1990
The court found the memoranda were not binding: the alleged signatory Ng had no authority to bind the company; the proposed renewal was void for uncertainty as to rent; any pre-emption was limited to the first tenancy and had lapsed; the second written tenancy agreement, signed by the parties and containing a clause excluding other representations, superseded prior alleged agreements and bound the tenant under L'Estrange; consequently the landlord's notice of termination was valid and judgment was entered for the plaintiff with mesne profits and costs.