3 Mar 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 文海欣
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 222
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC134/2024
The Court accepted the respondent's position that the trial judge did not err in principle or exercise of discretion: the financial scale, duration, multiplicity of victims and conspirators justified the starting points and four‑year aggregate benchmark; the judge properly applied discounts for plea and assistance and differentiated sentencing where appropriate; consequently the application for leave to appeal against sentence was refused.