10 Jan 2017
HO HON PIU v. HO HON KA
- Citation
- HO HON PIU v. HO HON KA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1966/2013
Court found no credible evidence of the alleged family fund or of the oral agreements creating one‑third beneficial interests; accepted defendant's evidence that he was sole legal and beneficial owner of the North Point property and that the Chai Wan property passed to him as surviving joint tenant; the will was properly executed but the residuary disposition to plaintiff is void under s.10(1) Wills Ordinance, so the estate must be dealt with on intestacy.