11 May 1995
BRADSTONE LTD v. CARRY EXPRESS INVESTMENT LTD
- Citation
- BRADSTONE LTD v. CARRY EXPRESS INVESTMENT LTD
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDNT764/1995
The notice was valid because the respondent's insertion of grounds under the printed sub‑paragraph (2) must be read together with the printed words indicating opposition; applying a liberal construction, the form satisfied s.119(5) despite the failure to delete the alternative paragraph and the imperfect drafting of the inserted ground; costs were refused because the respondent did not act frivolously and costs are constrained by the governing statutes.