29 Oct 1996
ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Citation
- ATTORNEY GENERAL v. TAT FUNG ENTERPRISES CO. LTD.
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV133/1996
Appeals dismissed because appellant failed to produce material facts to displace the statutory presumption created by s33(8) of the Buildings Ordinance and therefore had no arguable defence that the structures were not annexed to the land.