16 Jun 2017
AA AND ANOTHER v. THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION
- Citation
- AA AND ANOTHER v. THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL41/2016
The court refused all proposed amendments because they were late, moved away from the core issues on which leave was granted, lacked merit or evidential support, and could have been raised earlier; specifically the new ground about Japanese law and Engel criteria was rejected as not properly part of the proceedings and unarguable; accordingly the summons for leave to amend was dismissed and an order nisi made for costs against the applicants.