29 Jul 2014
屠 v. 李
- Citation
- 屠 v. 李
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC15826/2013
Leave to appeal was refused because the Husband failed to show an arguable case with reasonable prospects of success on the 12 grounds; the District Court lawfully exercised its discretion under CJR and Order 1A to deal with a consent application filed and unamended for months; the Orders constituted lump sum orders within MPPO s4 with instalments specified under s4(2)(b); questions about timing of instalments, sequencing and set-off do not amount to prohibited variations under s11 and can be resolved by directions; the imperfect inclusion of a section 18 declaration in the sealed order will…