4 Mar 2019
RE MAHMUD NASIR
- Citation
- [2019] HKCA 190
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV360/2018
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to identify any question of great general or public importance under s22(1)(b) and his substantive complaints about risk, assessment of country-of-origin information and procedural unfairness were found misplaced; no basis existed to grant leave under the "otherwise" limb, so statutory requirements for leave were not met.