12 Jan 2015
LU JUN v. ASTROTEC COMPANY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Citation
- LU JUN v. ASTROTEC COMPANY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP3125/2014
The application to file opposing evidence out of time was refused because the respondent's delay was unexplained and unparticularised, its stated logistical excuses (director in Shanghai, festive season) were not credible in the modern communications context and/or postdated the deadline, and the respondent's evidence lacked substantive particulars and conflicted with the winding-up statement, with no authority shown to justify the asserted use of s228A.