31 May 2018
LEE YUI KAI v. TD CO., LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 607
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC111/2015
The court found Applicant was not in genuine doubt as to his employer, his pleadings and witness statements were inadequate to justify joining R1, and R2 did not mislead Applicant; section 3 indicated R2 remained the employer when Applicant worked for R1 using R2's tools; accordingly it was unreasonable to require R2 to bear the costs of R1 and Applicant must pay R1's costs assessed at $6,000. This justified refusing a Sanderson/Bullock order against R2.