26 Oct 2007
ARMITAGE BRIAN RODERICK v. CORROSION CONTROL INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Citation
- ARMITAGE BRIAN RODERICK v. CORROSION CONTROL INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA1/2007
Section 30 validly allowed security even where asset disposal had already occurred; however the entry of judgment under section 29A for non‑payment of that security was an inappropriate and erroneous exercise of discretion in these circumstances; accordingly the November Order (judgment) and October Order (security order) were set aside and the claim remitted to the Labour Tribunal, with existing security to remain held as security.