10 Jun 1992
THE QUEEN v. BOB LIT
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. BOB LIT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA314/1992
The magistrate properly convicted the appellant because he was properly charged in his personal capacity, section 20 does not preclude charging a director, the stylised mark used by the appellant so closely resembled the registered "les must de Cartier" as to be calculated to deceive or likely to cause confusion, and statutory defences under section 26 were not established; accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the conviction and fine are upheld.