23 Apr 2021
香港特別行政區 訴 俞鵬東
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 538
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC325/2019
On the uncontested evidence and expert proof the flat was a functioning cocaine production laboratory with substantial reagents and tools and the applicant's conduct (misleading statements, failure to attend meetings, and immediate departure to the Mainland) was incompatible with innocence; the trial judge's directions to the jury were correct and fair; therefore the conviction was safe. On sentencing, the manufacture constituted a continuous, mid‑scale operation falling within the guideline that such cases attract sentences not less than 20 years, so the 20‑year sentence was appropriate and…