10 May 2023
羅小萍 對 東華三院賽馬會健逸之家及另二人
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1161
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA34/2021
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's grounds relied on factual disputes and credibility assessments properly resolved by the tribunal; the proposed new evidence was irrelevant to the legal question and would not affect the result; the tribunal validly exercised its discretion in refusing subpoenas; therefore no arguable question of law or jurisdiction for appellate intervention existed.