30 Apr 2019
冠成行有限公司 對 卓越泛亞有限公司
- Citation
- [2019] HKLdT 31
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDPE222/2019
Tribunal found the applicant's account more credible on available documents and testimony: the May 2018 payment clause reflected the parties' arrangement and respondent was not entitled to treat the prior tenant's deposit as discharging his obligation; building works did not excuse payment; therefore respondent liable for arrears and must surrender vacant possession unless arrears and costs are paid into the Tribunal by the specified date to avoid forfeiture.