14 Apr 2011
RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA954/2005
The court found that the Amsterdam meeting produced binding terms which were formally recorded in the 12 March 1999 letter but did not include any guarantee of a minimum annual bonus of US$200,000 nor any one-year notice term; bonuses were contractual and payable only by reference to the Amsterdam/12 March formula based on actual billings; HCL Technologies (Hong Kong) Limited alone was the employer; plaintiff was entitled to specified bonus sums for FY1999-2002 and a assessed further bonus to Feb 2004, payment in lieu of 3 months' notice, and miscellaneous sums; Shiv Nadar was not personally…