5 Sept 2005
CHINA KING PROPERTIES LTD v. THE OCCUPIERS OF THE SAID LAND AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHINA KING PROPERTIES LTD v. THE OCCUPIERS OF THE SAID LAND AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1020/2002
The appeal was dismissed because the counterclaim alleging harassment and consequential loss was insufficiently particularised and unsupported by evidence such that it could not displace the Master's discretionary order requiring interim payments into court as security for rental and potential damages; there was also no evidence of plaintiff impecuniosity to vary the order.