20 Oct 2020
SANG CHEOL WOO v. YOO SHIN CHOI(naturalized name CHARLES C. SPACKMAN)
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 2706
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1586/2016
The Hong Kong Court held that the SG undertaking was not engaged because the Hong Kong injunction was an independent exercise of the Hong Kong Court's jurisdiction and therefore its non‑disclosure did not mandate discharge; on the merits the Plaintiff had established a real risk of dissipation and credible evidence of nominee arrangements undermining Kim's explanations, so the Hong Kong Mareva injunction was continued (or would be re‑granted) and the setting aside summons was dismissed; the stay of disclosure was lifted.