20 Oct 2006
H v. LAU KA YEE MICHAEL AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- H v. LAU KA YEE MICHAEL AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI901/2004
The court held it was not plain and obvious that the Diocese's pleaded causes of action were unsustainable; contested issues of vicarious liability, negligence, fiduciary duty and limitation (including disability tolling) required full factual inquiry and could not be resolved on strike-out. Therefore the strike-out applications were dismissed and the claims permitted to proceed to trial.