14 Oct 2019
CHEA SHIU CHOW v. CHEUNG WAI KEUNG, THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF CHEUNG CHIT CHIU, DECEASED AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2478
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1346/2012
The TA signed by the claimant was a valid and binding periodic tenancy; plaintiff failed to demonstrate the TA was a sham or otherwise vitiated and failed to prove the requisite intention to exclude the world and the owner. The SPA did not transfer any good possessory title from Wu. Consequently adverse possession was not established; claim dismissed and defendants entitled to vacant possession, mesne profits and costs.