15 Mar 2013
HO PO YENG v. HO MING CHUN AND OTHERS
- Citation
- HO PO YENG v. HO MING CHUN AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCW100/2011
Petition dismissed because the evidence of mismanagement was general and not sufficiently serious to constitute unfair prejudice or breaches of duty; loss of substratum was not established as the company's objects included property/rental activities which remained viable and supported by a majority of shareholders; accordingly neither a just and equitable winding up under s177(1)(f) nor a s168A buy-out order was justified.