14 Apr 2011
RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- RAJ KUMAR MAHAJAN v. HCL TECHNOLOGIES (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1510/2004
The court found the Amsterdam Note and the 12 March 1999 letter together formed the operative contractual terms: bonuses were payable by reference to actual billings using the prescribed percentages (no contractual minimum guaranteed annual bonus), HCL Technologies (Hong Kong) Limited was the sole employer, there was no contractually binding 1 year notice period and the appropriate notice in lieu was three months' salary; Mr Nadar did not incur personal liability under the alleged oral agreements; loans/advances received by plaintiff are to be credited against sums due.