8 May 2015
POON KA MAN JASON v. CHENG WAI TAO AND OTHERS
- Citation
- POON KA MAN JASON v. CHENG WAI TAO AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV135/2013
The application for leave to appeal is refused because the questions raised are not reasonably arguable or of sufficient general or public importance; the contested principles (Bell v Lever and Duomatic) are well established and their application is fact‑specific and contextual; issues about shareholder consent, counsel's trial position and cross‑examination are likewise fact‑specific; and the defendants cannot rely on an unpleaded unclean hands defence on appeal.