27 Jan 2017
LAM AND LAI SOLICITORS v. HO CHUN YAN ALBERT
- Citation
- LAM AND LAI SOLICITORS v. HO CHUN YAN ALBERT
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP555/2015
The Master found the 64 items were not of an unreasonable amount nor unreasonably incurred because the proceedings were extremely complex, urgent and of high public importance, justifying participation of two fee earners; there was no evidence the defendant had imposed a cost limit or withheld approval, so the review application was dismissed.