21 Feb 2017
The deportation claim failed as a matter of law because the plaintiff was an illegal entrant lawfully removed; the assault claim was both unsupported by evidence (no medical reports or damage computation) and barred by the six‑year limitation period, so both claims were plainly incapable of success and constituted an abuse of process; strike out was appropriate and costs awarded.
19 Jan 2017
Court found defendants' versions of the 2000.01.29 and 2008.12.06 meeting minutes tendered by defendants were forged and lacked provenance; committee allowances required AGM approval and were not validly approved, thus D1, D2 and D4 liable to repay committee allowances; D3 was not a committee member or trustee and having performed secretarial duties the payment was proper remuneration so claim against D3 failed; local phone allowances for D1–D3 were reasonable committee expenses but D1's long‑distance phone costs were largely private and recoverable; trustee exception to limitation (s20(1)(b)…