29 Dec 2020
香港特別行政區 訴 安保工程有限公司
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 3122
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA213/2019
The Court held that on the evidence the worker was wearing ordinary spectacles without side‑guards or safety markings and those did not constitute the "appropriate eye protector" required by reg 43(b); the appellant, though it provided training and PPE, failed to "ensure" the worker used the provided protective goggles and therefore conviction under WKS 6623/2018 was safe and must be confirmed; the trial judge properly exercised discretion refusing costs for WKS 6622 and WKS 6624 because facts gave rise to self‑invited suspicion, but the refusal of costs for WKS 6625 was not supported and mus…