21 Sept 1992
CHAN SUK BING ANGIE v. HABOUR PHOENIX LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- CHAN SUK BING ANGIE v. HABOUR PHOENIX LTD. AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA46/1991
The appeal is allowed because the presiding officer failed to discharge the statutory duty under s.20(3) to investigate relevant undisputed facts (including closure of the packaging section, payments of severance to packers, absence of independent evidence of a replacement and reliance on an unverified letter), and thus could not properly be satisfied that the presumption of redundancy had been rebutted; matter remitted for rehearing before a different presiding officer.