15 Apr 1985
LAM KING CHOI v. MA CHI DICK
- Citation
- LAM KING CHOI v. MA CHI DICK
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ32/1985
District Court dismissed possession claims for lack of jurisdiction because the tenancy continued under Part II of Cap.7 and only the Lands Tribunal can terminate such tenancies; the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to the increased rent because the s.61 notice was invalid and the Commissioner lacked power under s.59(4) to back‑date an increase so as to circumvent the statutory notice protections, therefore arrears claims were dismissed.