Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Statutory interpretation of s.20
  • 8 Nov 1989

    ATTORNEY CENERAL v. LEUNG KWOK WAH

    Citation
    ATTORNEY CENERAL v. LEUNG KWOK WAH
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCMA730/1989

    Where the original trial magistrate made no effective order under s.20 regarding costs, a magistrate who becomes seised of the matter implicitly adjourns under s.20(1) and has jurisdiction to award costs under s.20(2); the Principal Magistrate did not misexercise his discretion in awarding HK$3,000 to compensate the respondent for costs incurred due to prosecution default, and the appeal is dismissed.