11 May 2018
高英姿 v. 何東道貳、肆、陸、捌號業主立案法團
- Citation
- [2018] HKLdT 32
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM264/2015
Applicant's claims were dismissed because she failed to prove that the mesh fence, items hung thereon, the parking activity or the spotlight caused interference of sufficient seriousness to constitute a nuisance under s.34I; many allegations were unsubstantiated, infrequent or self-caused, and the cause of action was premature at commencement of proceedings.