29 Jun 2017
FAN KAI MING v. LAM SUSAN SHUI HING
- Citation
- FAN KAI MING v. LAM SUSAN SHUI HING
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2037/2015
The court held that indemnity costs were not justified on Ground 1 because the plaintiff's claim raised an arguable point of construction and his conduct did not take the case out of the norm; however the statutory tender made by the defendant on 28 May 2015 qualified as a sanctioned payment under Order 22, the plaintiff could not beat it and therefore indemnity costs and enhanced interest under Order 22 r23(4)(a) and (b) were appropriate. The court varied the earlier costs order nisi: plaintiff to pay defendant's costs on an indemnity basis to be taxed with certificate for counsel and to pay…