4 Nov 2014
BB & R LTD v. CHINAPLUS WINES LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- BB & R LTD v. CHINAPLUS WINES LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1332/2013
The court concluded that there was no credible defence to the invoiced debt amounts on the material before it but, because of the extent and character of CWL's counterclaims and disputes (particularly over storage and other profit claims), unconditional summary judgment was inappropriate; accordingly the court granted conditional leave to defend subject to payment into court (HK$800,000 in HCA 1889/2012 and HK$1,500,000 in HCA 1332/2013), ordered delivery up of the affected wines to BBRL at BBRL's cost, allowed certain further affidavits, reserved costs and required written submissions on cos…