29 Jan 1997
POLORACE INVESTMENTS LTD v. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS
- Citation
- POLORACE INVESTMENTS LTD v. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV211/1996
The strike‑out order was correctly upheld because the plaintiff failed to establish a clear, breached representation giving rise to estoppel or any prejudice, and legitimate expectation in public law was unavailable where the Crown acted as private landlord; consequently the pleaded grounds based on the Director's letter and the land administration policy were legally unsustainable and the appeal was dismissed.