28 Jan 2014
王秉岐 v. LEE CHEE HO, JULEUS
- Citation
- 王秉岐 v. LEE CHEE HO, JULEUS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA186/2010
The court struck out the RRADC because it disclosed no reasonable defence: the defendant had admitted on multiple occasions that the transfers could be effected without the alleged Necessary Documents, the so‑called document defects and C&P lien did not prevent performance, and the late‑raised 3% share issue was a dilatory tactic rather than a bona fide defence; accordingly summary judgment was unnecessary but would likewise have been appropriate; plaintiff awarded judgment with damages to be assessed and costs.