28 Oct 2015
MAK YUNG NIN v. LI WING YIU SAMUEL
- Citation
- MAK YUNG NIN v. LI WING YIU SAMUEL
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1965/2015
The Letter was admissible because it sought accommodation and did not evidence a bona fide settlement of a dispute; the alleged oral 'Common Understanding' was inadmissible under the parol evidence rule because the post-dated cheques had been delivered operatively under the written Agreement and the oral evidence attempted to qualify/defeat liability on those cheques. The defendant failed to raise a believable triable issue; summary judgment for $360,000 with interest and costs was granted.