22 Jul 2020
黃潔貞 對 周富平
- Citation
- [2020] HKDC 548
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ5936/2018
The court found the documentary and payment evidence established the post‑term arrangement as a monthly periodic tenancy, not a two‑year fixed tenancy; the applicants therefore lacked a reasonable prospect of success on appeal, so permission to appeal and a stay were refused and strike‑out applications dismissed; interim costs orders were made in favour of the plaintiff with specified assessed amounts.