23 Dec 2015
CHEUNG AH MEI AND ANOTHER v. WONG SHIU LING
- Citation
- CHEUNG AH MEI AND ANOTHER v. WONG SHIU LING
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2025/2014
The court held the defendant's appeal was dismissed because the amended pleading showed an arguable case and the memorandum was ambiguous rather than dispositive; the defendant should have sought further and better particulars instead of pursuing a full strike out; having achieved only partial success (the plaintiffs agreed to delete the Impugned Statement), the defendant was ordered to pay 70% of the plaintiffs' costs of and occasioned by the Striking Out Summons, including the appeal, with costs to be summarily assessed on submitted statements of costs.