5 Mar 2026
曹連英 對 駿盈顧問有限公司
- Citation
- [2026] HKCA 347
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CAMP38/2024
The Court refused leave because the proposed appeal raised only issues of a personal nature and not matters of wide public importance under Cap 484 s22(1)(b), there were no other reasons to justify a CFA appeal, the applicant failed to provide an adequate explanation for delay and the asserted grounds (delay by respondent's counsel, judge's failure to remind of time limit, solicitor misconduct) had been considered and rejected; the application had no real prospect of success.