29 Sept 2023
Leave to appeal refused because the proposed appeal lacked a reasonable prospect of success and did not raise any matter that would justify leave in the interests of justice; the Insurance Authority owes no compensatory duty in the circumstances and the plaintiff pursued the wrong procedural route; costs awarded to respondent.
15 Mar 2021
The out‑of‑time appeal was refused because the strike‑out order was correct: the claim disclosed no reasonable cause, was frivolous and an abuse of process as it sought to re‑litigate unoverturned criminal convictions; therefore there was no real prospect of success and no basis to grant permission to file an out‑of‑time appeal.
29 Jan 2015
The application for leave to appeal is refused because the appellant has no reasonable prospect of success and there are no other reasons in the interests of justice to hear the appeal; the proposed amendment is procedurally ineffective after strike-out; the limited use of English did not render the hearing unfair; costs awarded to the respondent.
5 Dec 2012
The court granted an extension of time solely for the first plaintiff to appeal the civil restraint order because, despite the serious delay and lack of explanation, she demonstrated a reasonably arguable ground of appeal on whether the restriction order against her was justified; the court refused to extend time for appeals against the striking out orders because those strike-out decisions were plainly correct and lacked merit. The second plaintiff's application for extension was dismissed. The first plaintiff must serve and file a notice of appeal within seven days. Costs were awarded to de…