29 Apr 1985
THE QUEEN v. LO LAU MING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- THE QUEEN v. LO LAU MING AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA306/1985
The conviction of the 2nd appellant was upheld because the magistrate reasonably accepted direct eyewitness evidence of a sale corroborated by the purchaser; the conviction of the 1st appellant was quashed because mere presence and association, without further probative evidence, did not satisfy the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt.