10 Aug 2021
MEMORAN CO LTD v. THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF MEI HING MANSION
- Citation
- [2021] HKCA 1146
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV48/2021
The Court dismissed the application to adduce fresh evidence because the proposed post‑hearing evidence would not probably have an important influence on the result of the appeal (second Ladd v Marshall condition not satisfied). The Court refused the application to amend the Defence in the Court of Appeal as the proposed amendments were not necessary to pursue the appeal and could be applied for in the court below if the declarations were set aside. The summons was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff.