15 Nov 2005
CHIN KAM CHIU AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Citation
- CHIN KAM CHIU AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMC69/2005
Leave to appeal was refused because the complaints were fact‑sensitive criticisms of the trial judge's summing‑up that did not raise questions of law of general importance, and because the Court of Appeal legitimately applied the proviso given overwhelming evidence such that no substantial and grave injustice arose.