8 Oct 2018
張勁松及另一人 對 張虹美
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 1245
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ4745/2016
Leave to appeal refused because the defendant's grounds did not show a reasonable prospect of success nor any other reason in the interests of justice; the summons to require the second plaintiff to give evidence was legally unfounded and unnecessary; the plaintiffs' summons for security for costs was withdrawn and no costs order made on that summons.