26 Jul 2018
SINGH HARDEV v. DOKE JITENDRA AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 889
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2569/2016
Court found on balance that only one genuine personal loan of HK$90,000 was proved; Cheques A,B,C relate to that loan and s30 BEO presumption applies; Cheques D and E involved failure of consideration and dishonest alteration by plaintiff; judgment entered for HK$90,000 against 1st defendant with interest from presentation dates of Cheques A,B,C; costs ordered nisi for no order as to costs due to both parties' untruthful testimony.