12 Feb 2010
SINO FAVOUR DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. KAN KAR FAI AND OTHERS
- Citation
- SINO FAVOUR DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. KAN KAR FAI AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1518/2005
The appeal was dismissed because the specific discovery application was misconceived: the documents were not relevant to issues as pleaded before the Master, could and should have been sought from the plaintiffs who claimed them, and later proposed amendments could not be considered on this appeal; indemnity costs were not appropriate but costs were ordered as specified (common fund to non-party and party-to-party to plaintiffs).