10 Jan 2014
TCWF v. LKKS
- Citation
- TCWF v. LKKS
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV154/2012
Key holdings: (1) No sustainable apparent bias; judge did not have to recuse for the ancillary relief trial. (2) Findings of forgery and perjury based on SP1 were set aside because documents were not properly admissible/ proved and because compromise (23 Feb 2011) operated as res judicata/estoppel to preclude re-litigation of forgery in ancillary relief; those specific findings cannot stand. (3) Referral of the judgment to the DPP is not appealable and was within judicial practice; language used was not improper. (4) Fathers contractual rights under the Framework Agreement and Special Articl…