18 Oct 2018
CHAU PUI NGAI v. CHAU YAU ZING AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2368
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA298/2017
Substituted service was justified because the plaintiff exhausted reasonable means of personal service, the last known address and other methods made the proposed substituted service likely to notify D2, and it was appropriate to impose a 28‑day compliance period from the date substituted service is effected; therefore personal service was dispensed with and substituted service ordered, with costs to the plaintiff.